@leodurruti so sorry new changes applied π thanks
@hatthieves @HatBot this stuff should be opt-in, not opt-out
@hatthieves @HatBot otherwise you're just following the usual spyware logic
@grainloom we are not spying, fediverse is #public π
@hatthieves i didn't say you were, i said you are following the same logic.
that needing to ask for consent is too much work for you, and that the data is already "public" (no matter what kind of publicity the author had in mind) so you can do whatever you want with it.
@grainloom we are not collecting any kind of data, we read it directly from the instance
@hatthieves i'm not gonna argue semantics.
just consider how making your thing opt-in would work. you might find that it's better for everyone.
dear @hatthieves , I first report @HatBot then I discuss to be completely clear
I totally agree with @grainloom that you need explicit consensus, so please follow only account with the # yesbot tag
you profit of the "default power" in the fediverse since there is no by-design software solution for people to avoid this sick behaviour
please stop to make experiments on us
@hatthieves @HatBot You need to get explicit opt-in for this sort of thing. βOpt out with #nobotβ is not good enough
@hatthieves is good that the problem has gone away. π
IMO there never was consensus for #nobot. I never agreed to it. A group of other people cannot decide that I have consented to bots unless I opt out.
@ebel not even fucking grace
@hatthieves well, it doesn't seem to be solved, I have the #nobots tag in bio and I've just been followed by @HatBot